FIELD GUIDESource-led reference

USB · Class

USB-C charging-only cable class

A USB-C cable with a high power rating can still carry USB 2.0 data; a power label alone does not mean “charging-only”.

USB Type-Cend A
USB Type-Cend B
Bidirectionaldirection evidence
Noneconversion

Endpoint map

Start with what is physically represented

Physical USB-C ends are reversible; host/device role remains setup-specific.

Capability ledger

Six questions kept separate

DataConditional

A power-rated USB-C cable can still carry USB 2.0; charging label does not prove no data.

Evidence: C046A

Power / chargingDocumented

Power marking is a separate evidence field from data capability.

Evidence: C046A

VideoUnknown

Video support is not established by a power label.

ConversionNone

No conversion function is represented.

Length / reachNot Established

No class-wide length claim asserted.

Markings / certificationDocumented

USB-IF power/data markings must be interpreted separately.

Evidence: C046A

Explicit unknowns
  • Charging-only cannot be inferred from a high power label alone.

Source boundary

Why this profile says what it says

Back to first citation ↑
C046ASource checked · pending review

A USB-C cable with a high power rating can still carry USB 2.0 data; a power label alone does not mean “charging-only”.

Scope: Consumer identification / documented standard or product class only · review due 2026-12-30

C046BSource checked · pending review

USB-IF’s January 2026 cable-logo guidance separates power and data markings. USB 2 C-to-C cables use power marking without a required data-rate number; that omission is not evidence of no data support.

Scope: Present USB-IF compliance and logo guidance for USB Type-C-to-Type-C cables; not a retrospective classification of every legacy cable. · review due 2027-01-06

USB-IF · USB Type-C cable logo usage guidelines, January 2026

USB 2.0 data capability is distinct from 60 W / 240 W power labeling.

Open source ↗

USB 2.0 Type-C cables and power marking · Certification artwork and logos are not reproduced.

Common questions

Questions this record can help resolve

Evidence behind this page

Scope first. Source second. Approval separate.

2 linked sources · 2 scoped claims · 0 sources with inspection/access flags.

Page scope: class

Assessment 2026-10-22 · earliest scheduled source review 2026-12-30. This is a recorded-date assessment, not a live source check. Page-level independent review is not established by this panel.

Inspect 2 source scopes, access limits and dates

S008 · Cable and connector compliance

USB-IF · Standards-organization domain · inspected 2026-10-01 · due 2026-12-30

Within inspection window

Scoped support: Certification labels distinguish power from data capability.

Not established / limitations: This atlas is not USB-IF certified and does not reproduce certification artwork.

Locator: Cable power and data logo requirements

S040 · USB Type-C cable logo usage guidelines, January 2026

USB-IF · Standards-organization domain · inspected 2026-10-01 · due 2026-12-30

Within inspection window

Scoped support: USB 2.0 data capability is distinct from 60 W / 240 W power labeling.

Not established / limitations: Certification artwork and logos are not reproduced.

Locator: USB 2.0 Type-C cables and power marking

Trace 2 claims to their source records

C046A · P046

A USB-C cable with a high power rating can still carry USB 2.0 data; a power label alone does not mean “charging-only”.

Claim scope: Consumer identification / documented standard or product class only

Source links: S040 · Evidence trail → (private workspace)

C046B · P046

USB-IF’s January 2026 cable-logo guidance separates power and data markings. USB 2 C-to-C cables use power marking without a required data-rate number; that omission is not evidence of no data support.

Claim scope: Present USB-IF compliance and logo guidance for USB Type-C-to-Type-C cables; not a retrospective classification of every legacy cable.

Source links: S040 · S008 · Evidence trail → (private workspace)

Prepare this page for review → (private workspace)Read the evidence method →

Recorded evidence only. An inspection date, publisher label, source link or generated packet is not independent technical review, hardware testing, fabrication approval or a compatibility verdict.